Renzi is moved to the Justice Commission: “I want to follow the Nordio reform”

Matthew Renzi he moves to the Justice Committee, in the Senate, to personally follow the justice reform presented by the minister Charles Nordio. “I welcomed a nice idea of Enrico Costa – says the leader of IV in his newsletter Enews – and thanks to the availability of Ivan Scalfarotto and Lella Paita we have decided that in the discussions on the Nordio reform I will move to the Justice Commission leaving my commission”, Finance and treasure, “to Ivan. So I will personally follow the Nordio bill from the Commission and with Costa we have decided that we will work side by side by presenting amendments together and playing side-by-side, he in the House, I in the Senate. It seems to me a good way to try to affirm the ideas on which we worked together in the Government and on which we campaigned together: we will try,” says Renzi. And the line of the Third Pole is known: it supports the action of Nordio and the need for justice reforms in a guarantor sense. “It would be useful to recover lucidity and carry out a real reform, which serves everyone”, says the former prime minister.

The commission on the Covid

On another chapter, Renzi moves independently and in the opposite direction to the other opposition parties: the parliamentary commission of inquiry into Covid set up by the center-right. “If we do not shed light on the Russian army in Italy, on educational and school policies, on masks and ventilators, on how to manage the emergency, the tragedy of Covid will once again be a wasted tragedy”, writes the leader of Italy Viva.

“Understand why Joseph Conte asked Putin to let Russian soldiers enter Italy – he attacks – to understand if the procedures for selling masks and fans have paved the way for unjust personal enrichment, to understand if the closures and reopenings have been managed with scientific assessments or on the basis of humoral evaluations, understand if the educational and school policies from the reopenings to the wheelchairs were the result of a political strategy or a populist evaluation, understand if we have learned anything for the future of a possible emergency in the light of what has happened, understand if there have been differences between Arcuri management and Figliuolo management not only on vaccines (for us yes), understanding what has changed for public health after the pandemic: all of this must be the subject of great attention for us “.