Delmastro-Donzelli case, FdI insists: “The Democratic Party has raised the bar beyond measure”. Calenda to Meloni: “To ask for unity you need respect”

Delmastro-Donzelli case, FdI insists: "The Democratic Party has raised the bar beyond measure".  Calenda to Meloni: "To ask for unity you need respect"

[ad_1]

“The Democratic Party has raised the bar beyond all measure”, insists the Brothers of Italy. And so the controversy does not subside, after the words of Giorgia Meloni than yesterday from Berlin, during the press conference with the German chancellor Olaf Scholzshe glossed over the question of a journalist who asked her for a position on the case Donzelli-Delmastro and on the new attack made by the Undersecretary of Justice on the exponents of the Democratic Party who went to the Sassari prison on 12 January to visit Alfred Cospito, the anarchist imprisoned in the 41 bis. “I appeal to everyone’s responsibility against the threat of terrorism in our country and beyond national borders,” Meloni said, calling for national unity.

The premier’s words were taken up today by the FdI defense minister, Guido Crosetto. “We need to know how to set aside the political controversy when it is the State (not this or that government) that is under attack – writes Crosetto on Twitter – the threat of the anarcho-insurrectionists, who are joining forces with antagonistic groups and remnants of terrorism, is to the institutions democratic”. But Charles Calendaleader of Azione, replies piqued: “In fact, Guido. And it is to cement this unity that Donzelli and Delmastro keep repeating that the left bows down to the mafia. Unity is achieved with mutual respect and the careful and never instrumental use against minorities of the powers of the State. The opposite of what you have done”.

Licia Ronzulli, leader of Forza Italia in the Senate, however insists: ”The opposition between the majority and the opposition on these fundamental issues is wrong, because it opens a gap and makes us weak. And when we are weak, we are attacked”. And words continue to arrive from FdI that follow those of the prime minister. As if it was the attitudes of the Democratic Party that triggered the controversies of these days and not the offensive words and attacks by the exponents of the Meloni’s party. “We ask the opposition political forces for a sense of responsibility and an institutional synergy in the defense of democracy from the pitfalls of subversive groups who have been attacking our nation every day with threats, violence and language since the seventies”, he says Alfredo Antoniozzi, deputy group leader of Fdi in the Chamber. AND Thomas Fotileader of the party in Montecitorio, to the microphones of Radiouno increases the dose: “The Democratic Party wanted to raise the bar beyond measure. In the face of the group leader of the Democratic Party who affirmed in the Chamber that he had never questioned the application of the 41 bis to Cospito, there were some positions of the day first of both the former minister Orlando and the deputy secretary of the Democratic Party Provenzano who went exactly in the opposite direction, that is, they asked for the revocation of the 41 bis in Cospito “.

To defend the dem comes a post by Mara Carfagnapresident of Azione, who wrote on Twitter: “The approach to the Cospito case was completely wrong. If there is the risk of welding between anarchists and mafia bosses against 41 bis, a serious government calls everyone together. It does not create frontal clashes that benefit the enemies of the state, to attack political opponents”. And in an interview with Everyday occurrence the leader of 5S, Joseph Contesays: “Fratelli d’Italia is reacting in an unacceptable way: it thinks it can ignore the irresponsibility and serious superficiality of two of its exponents, Delmastro and the vice president of Copasir Donzelli, by insulting and fanning the flames. Accusing an opposition force to have bowed to the will of the mafiosi is shameful, and aggravates the position of those who have disclosed confidential information for the purpose of political struggle”.

[ad_2]

Source link