Transcriptions of gay children, Pro Vita attacks Amato: “Very serious and partisan sentences. Consulta in the throes of ideological schizophrenia”

“Demanding a child at all costs, violating his right to have and grow up with a mother and father, is and will always be wrong and in a civilized country it can never be considered constitutional”. As Jacopo Coghespokesman for Pro Vita & Famiglia onlus, the ultra-Catholic association whose Charter of Values, last September, a few days before the vote, was signed by the center-right leaders Giorgia Meloni, Matthew Salvini And Silvio Berlusconi.

“Both the uterus for rent and the trade in gametes – continues Coghe – are claims to buy children by trampling on their rights. In this regard, the very serious sentences of Giuliano Amato in the interview given to Republic on an alleged constitutionality of the transcripts of the ‘children’ of same-sex couples are proof of how, in recent years, the Constitutional Court is in the grip of an ideological schizophrenia and far from reality with regard to ethical and sensitive issues”.

“Perhaps Amato forgets – concludes Coghe – that his sentences are denied by the same Court which in the past declared the prohibition of heterologous fertilization for lesbian couples in Law 40 legitimate. If that prohibition is right, how can the transcripts be constitutional? It is therefore understandable how Amato’s approach is the partisan one of a Consulta which, currently, wants to impose the political agenda on Parliament, violating the separation of powers and representative democracy”.

Amato’s words to the Republic

“Recognizing the children of two mothers is constitutional”, said the president emeritus of the Consulta a Republic. “Where there is no surrogacy, in female homosexual couples I see no obstacles to the recognition of full parenthood even of the non-biological mother. Basically, in law, there should be two mothers”, the position of Amato.