Right criticisms and contradictions of the trade unions on tax delegation

Some principles that inspire the government reform project are wrong both structurally and in the current contingency. From the real estate income to the flat tax, what does not add up in the text passed to the CDM

Last week Giorgia Meloni went as prime minister to the CGIL congress and was challenged primarily for his tax delegation proposal. The unions are right to challenge the tax delegation not so much in the method (not having been consulted before) as precisely in the merits. They are certainly right because the fiscal delegation contains some completely wrong principles both structurally and in terms of contingency. It is wrong to give a favorable taxation to real estate income beyond a certain limit. Rental income has grown tremendously in Italy to the detriment of labor income (from 8 to 13 per cent of total income in 20 years). Continuing to excessively favor those who are taxed on real estate income is certainly a simplification for the taxpayer because it is very convenient to have a flat-rate taxation on rental income (21 or 10 percent), but we must be aware that all that is saved in taxes on real estate income will have to be covered by labor taxes. In particular, subjecting even the rents of commercial buildings (today subject to personal income tax) to a flat rate seems excessive.