Recruitments in ministries and justice reform, the Council of Ministers is underway
[ad_1]
Abuse of office disappears, while the extent of the trafficking of illicit influence is drastically reduced. The bans for journalists on wiretapping are widening. The public prosecutor will no longer be able to challenge the acquittal sentences (unless the crimes are particularly serious), while a collegiate judge will have to pronounce the request for pre-trial detention in prison and before the decision the suspect will have to be questioned by the judge, under penalty of nullity of the measure. These are the main innovations contained in the Nordio bill which arrived in the current Council of Ministers.
Recruitments in ministries
Then comes a charge of recruitment in the ministries, to strengthen the workforce and meet the commitments dictated by the Pnrr. These are foreseen by a new decree on public administration, expected in the next few hours in the Council of Ministers, which also establishes the suppression of Anpal, the agency for active policies, allocates resources for the Jubilee 2025 and extends to sport, intervening on capital gains and appeals to sports justice.
Abuse of office
The crime is canceled with the stroke of a pen because the changes introduced in recent years have not eliminated the “imbalance” between entries in the register of suspects and convictions: last year 3,536 of the 3,938 files opened in 2022 were filed. And in 2021 in the first instance there were only 18 convictions.
Trafficking in influences
The scope of application is “limited to particularly serious conduct”, excluding all cases of “bragging”. The statutory minimum sentence rises from one year and six months to four years and six months.
Prosecutor’s appeal
It will disappear for acquittal sentences concerning crimes of “reduced gravity”. A road already attempted in the past with the Pecorella reform rejected by the Constitutional Court. On the other hand, acquittals for the most serious crimes, including those of the Red Code, may be challenged by the prosecutor.
[ad_2]
Source link
