Raves and vaccines: two “no” essays by Ronzulli

Personally Licia Ronzulli he does two things right, by not voting for the entire so-called anti-rave measure and by voting even less, if we may say so, for the article of that decree in which, with a legislative and procedural somersault, the reintegration into the professional activity of doctors against vaccines. Then, institutionally, ie as group leader of FI in the Senate, he makes another correct one, because he gives instructions to his group to vote in favor of the government’s line and therefore against his conviction. It’s not a sudden decision, there’s no search for visibility. On contrasting raves with repressive and potentially dangerous tools for freedom of assembly, government activism may have taken a little by surprise. But on full support for vaccination campaigns, with the corollary of the obligations imposed on doctors and the fight against novax propaganda, yours is a clear position, right from that first half of the anti-vaccinist game which was played on the issue of mandatory vaccinations to access to schools before the pandemic and the explosion of anti-science protest. A “no” to leave room for society and individual freedom and one to ask that the state stand strong even against individual freedom when this puts lives in danger, in a proven and rationally predictable way. Two wise and serious nos. Well done.