Premiered, why yes. Marcello Pera replies to Luciano Violante

For a serious discussion, the president Luciano Violante is a suitable interlocutor. And of what he said to Annalisa Chirico I must say right away that I appreciate the way you argue but I’m rather disappointed by the conclusions. President Violante’s reasoning consists of a series of no’s concluded with a proposal. It could be defined as a rationalized neo-parliamentarianism, but it is better to leave the formulas alone, because they become cages that only generate nominalistic disputes. Let’s rather look at the substance. No to the American presidential system, says President Violante, because it only works well in a “pacified society”. And today it is no longer even that of the United States.