Digressions on the La Russa Jr. case, between amoral familism and ideological abstractions

This case La Russa jr is a river full of plots and subplots, the inexhaustible nourishment of the Italian summer. After the reports on the field and the reports from the Apophis Club (membership only), “a small pagan temple of 180 m2. fiefdom of the La Russa Bros” (Republic), “a super-luxury club frequented by DJs, influencers and even American rappers” (Il Messaggero), it is time for the portraits of Tommy Gilardoni, the second suspect, a friend of Lorenzo Apache (only incredible names in this story from “New Monsters”, the kind that come to mind two or three times in life to a good screenwriter). Previously cataloged as an elusive “Dj”, Tommy Gilardoni is now a “Comasco entrepreneur and playboy”, once specialized in open-barbecue in Val D’Intelvi, then scion of Milan who sends his children to London, where he opens two companies, “in the Hyde Park area”, with “predominantly male colleagues”, the Corriere is keen to specify, sensing a bit of the stench of patriarchy. Then, cascading, other decisive information: “unbridled luxury, supermodels, Paris, Formentera, billionaire swimming pools” (but what is a “billionaire swimming pool” like?).