Beloved: "Meloni is a pro-European and distances himself from Orbán"

[ad_1]

Second Julian Amato, president emeritus of the Constitutional Court, Meloni must choose: to stay with Europe or with the Hungarian president Viktor Orbán. A leading role in the Union “do not exercise it by standing alongside Orbán. It would be a suicidal policy. The premier who does not want peoples of mixed race is not worth France or Germany”, he said in an interview with Repubblica. This is why, according to the former Prime Minister’s theses, “the Italian right is in the midst of a contradiction”, less than a year from the European elections which will lead Meloni to have to make a choice with whom to ally to express the next president of the Commission.

Amato inscribes the discourse on Italy and Europe in a broader reasoning:“I see traces of a growing fragility of democracy in our country, but I see them even more in the United States”, he says, echoing the words and analyzes of personalities such as Romano Prodi and Joseph Stiglitz. And it is precisely because of this intrinsic fragility of democracies that the Brothers of Italy should come to terms with their origins: “It is unthinkable that rulers and institutional offices who swear allegiance to the Constitution do not recognize anti-fascism. Without anti-fascism there would be no Constitution. Within his party they still resist the robust residues of fascist culture, which he should get rid of as soon as possible”.

Regarding the issue of the Court of Auditors and the management of the Pnrr dossier, Amato has a critical position towards the government: “Completely removing that control of the Court of Auditors is a mistake. I would have been more elegant: I would have restored it in the collaborative way in which Brunetta had thought of it “, he reasons.

While on another hot topic that touches on ethical issues, Amato recalls that it was he himself who “wrote words of fire against surrogacy in the sentence of the Constitutional Court”. Yet the legislative decree of the majority who would like to make it a universal crime does not find it in favour: “I am absolutely against it because it takes its jurisdiction beyond what is permitted”. Even because “the risk is to hinder adoptions. The Constitutional Court has asked Parliament to protect the interests of minors in the best possible way”

[ad_2]

Source link