“A duty to ensure his health. We will never back down on 41 bis»- Corriere.it

our duty to ensure him the best health conditions and possibly transfer him to a clinic if they degenerate. Undersecretary of Justice Andrea Delmastro Delle Vedove returns to the Cospito case, at the center of the political controversy and does so at the end of a visit to the prison in Perugia. According to the undersecretary, Cospito monitored and therefore the health supply is constant. With constant monitoring of his health conditions, Delmastro affirmed that the strike is, in quotation marks, the right to relaunch requests. Of course the hunger strike cannot undermine a system inherited from Falcone and Borsellino to combat organized crime. We will never back down on 41 bis and 4 bis. Then on the visit of the Pd MPs in prison: I never said it was illegitimate, the problem is a completely different one.

And on the request for resignation by the dem, he replied: They have made a motion and we will see in the courtroom. I’m here to talk about the problems of the women and men of the penitentiary police, especially from Umbria, not to answer anything else. However, Delmastro recalled that on the one hand there was a request from Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni for everyone to tone down and on the other, I believe, an unequivocal clarification from Minister Nordio.

On the opposition front, however, the Green deputy, Angelo Bonelli, who had presented a complaint to the prosecutor’s office against Delmastro and Donzelli, explained that he received the answer from the Ministry of Justice. An evasive answer that does not provide the requested information. In ten lines I was given the transcript of a very extensive report. From the Ministry’s response, this document is given to me as an act of inspection union. And Donzelli made no such request. Bonelli underlined that he had asked for another thing, which was not given to me: the similar reports that the Dap makes, especially the talks between Presta, Rampulla, Di Maio and Cospito since the beginning of the hunger strike. With respect to this request, the Ministry of Justice opposes a refusal pursuant to art. 24 of Law 241 of 1990 and of Ministerial Decree 115 of 26 January 1996. What does it mean? The Ministry says that these documents cannot be accessed and therefore disclosed. So the second question: was Donzelli’s one among all these deeds the one in that part transferable and disclosed? Was there an element of evaluation that is independent of the law and the norm?.