“The climate adaptation plan? Impossible to do it in a month”
[ad_1]
“Did the government announce within the year that it will approve the climate change adaptation plan? However, it did not specify from which year”. Clear words those of Sergio Costa, former environment minister in both governments chaired by Giuseppe Conte and current vice president in the Chamber of Deputies again for the Five Star Movement. According to the former general of the Carabinieri, that Plan which also bears his signature, was already ready in 2018, but passing from one government to another without being approved “it is now outdated” he argues in no uncertain terms.
“Five years have passed and as it stands, it is no longer usable. It needs to be reviewed and linked to the new European legislation, the Pnrr and the new National Energy Plan. For the issues it addresses, i.e. the climate, the environment , the adaptation actions on the territories is as if it were fifty years older”. Costa knows that dossier well since he inherited it from former minister Gian Luca Galletti and integrated it into the National Energy and Climate Plan, before handing it over to Roberto Cingolani. Do you know what needs to be changed and the process that has brought it to what it is today: a regulatory tool that is no longer usable, but on which a hundred scientists and researchers from Ispra and the Euro-Mediterranean Center of the Climate changes.
Italy has a climate adaptation plan, but it has remained in the drawer
by Fiammetta Cupellaro
How long would it then take to update that Plan?
“Working hard from now, a year’s time. Because if on the one hand what the researchers say is true that some chapters that mainly concern the analysis of macro-regions can be recovered, the whole context must be considered archaeology”.
For example?
“In 2018, but also in 2019 when I took charge of it, there was no current energy crisis or even the objectives set by the European Green Deal in the fields of climate, transport, energy, but also taxation, circular economy, renewables. It’s really a new world. I wonder, how can a Plan that is not only a scientific tool, but also robust from an administrative and political point of view be drawn up by the end of the year?”
Is there a way out in your opinion for the government to be able to keep its promise? The tragedy of Ischia has shown the world how late we are on these issues.
“If they want to keep their word, the only way is to launch a Dpcm, a decree issued directly by the President of the Council of Ministers. With the pandemic, we have learned about this regulatory instrument which is immediately effective from the moment of publication in the Official Journal. A inter-ministerial administrative act because the ministries involved in the ‘climate’ issue are different, from that of the Environment to Transport, from Finance to Agriculture. It could be a programmatic Dpcm which in the meantime gives a long-term vision to be followed by the application documents ” .
Environment
Climate: only three regions (and there is no Campania) have a regional strategy
by Fiammetta Cupellaro
Otherwise?
“Otherwise, to do quickly but certainly not in a month, in my opinion it is to quickly approve the new Energy Plan, an issue on which the objectives and horizons dictated by Europe are already clear. I would link the Plan to this on the climate revised in the meantime by the scientists of Ispra and the CMCC But I repeat, by working hard, we arrive at the end of 2023 “.
Why is that document so important?
“Because it is not a simple administrative act, but a concrete tool on a scientific basis that indicates to everyone, local authorities, researchers, politicians, industrialists and citizens, how to face the future in the face of climate change in Italy. It explains what the vision, path and objectives. It is built with the contribution of many actors and must be brought to Brussels. It must be reviewed every two-three years, but it remains operational”.
Minister Gilberto Piccheto has been asked by Fratin to adopt the law on the protection of the soil. Even the one in the drawer for years?
“For more than twenty. What happened in Ischia shows that Italy can no longer live without a law on soil protection. We have never been able to come to an agreement, because for years we have been discussing only technical-bureaucratic issues, such as body is competent to collect urbanization charges and how they are managed or there is a division between who wants to build and who instead wants to regenerate. I proposed to the minister that, despite there being different visions, we make a legislative pact, we form a table interministerial meeting by bringing together representatives of the majority and the opposition in a constructive spirit. Ischia must be the watershed, we cannot yet be divided on these issues. In Italy, we can no longer afford to cement 2.2 square meters per second. This is the pace of construction. We must regenerate the territories, the historic centres, not cement again. There must no longer be another Casamicciola”.
[ad_2]
Source link
