Juventus, today at Coni the sentence on the appeal against the -15: here’s what can happen

Juventus, today at Coni the sentence on the appeal against the -15: here's what can happen

[ad_1]

It meets this afternoon at 14.30, in joint sections, the Guarantee college at Conicalled to rule on the legal legitimacy of the 15-point penalty imposed by the Federal Court of Appeal on the Juventus. The president, Gabriella Palmieri Sandulli, will meet in the Hall of Honor of Coni with the presidents of the sections Vito Branca, Attilio Zimatore, Massimo Zaccheo and Dante D’Alessio: it will be the last degree of judgment of the sporting process on capital gains. Three possible ways: the Guarantee Panel may reject Juventus’ appeal, thus confirming the penalty, cancel it by accepting the black and white appeal in the event of procedural defects or, third and last possibility, refer it to the Caf to remodulate the penalty or to re-examine the procedure. The decision could arrive in the evening, a few moments before the presentation conference Merry in Lisbon (scheduled for 18.30), which will inevitably be conditioned by it: tomorrow night’s match against Sporting could quickly become the only way to continue dreaming of the Champions League.

Juventus, investigation-bis: that’s why the bianconeri risk not being able to negotiate

by Dominic Marchese


The position of Juventus

In the 99 pages of the appeal presented by Juventus, the reasons for the 15-point penalty are attacked, six more than the request of 9 made by the federal prosecutor Chiné, a sentence which, according to the lawyers, contrasts with the proportionality of the sanction. Furthermore, the reopening of the capital gains trial, for which Juventus had previously been acquitted before the acquisition, by the federal prosecutor, of the documents of the Prisma investigation, argues that the first acquittal could not be revoked. But the most solid of Juventus’ arguments centers on the right to defence: the club was penalized 15 points for a violation, the one in article 4.1, the obligation of sporting loyalty, which was not present in the referral.

[ad_2]

Source link