Juventus-capital gains, because the sporting process can be redone – Corriere.it

Juventus-capital gains, because the sporting process can be redone - Corriere.it

[ad_1]

Of Monica Colombo Massimiliano Nerozzi

The Prosecutor’s Office of the Football Federation has asked for the ruling on capital gains to be overturned on the basis of new evidence, in particular what Cherubini has called Paratici’s black book

Sifted documents (and wiretaps) contained in the 15 folders sent by the Turin prosecutors investigating Juve’s accounts – in the face of the two search decrees merged into the first sporting trial – the Prosecutor of the Football Federation requested the partial revocation of the sentence on capital gains. In brutal summary, to redo the process. In May, the Federal Court of Appeal had rejected the complaint of the Public Prosecutor’s Office against the decision of the National Federal Court which, in turn, had acquitted the black-and-white people and the other defendants, due to the absence of any disciplinary offence. The FIGC prosecutor Giuseppe Chin would therefore have found new and probative facts in the documents, useful for reopening the case. The request, based on article 63 of the sports justice code, arrives on the eve of the expiry of the terms.

Juve responded with a note, late in the evening: The company will be able to present its defense within the terms set out in the code, trusting that it will be able to further demonstrate the correctness of its actions, the absence of new elements that have arisen that are relevant for the judgment with respect to the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and the lack of the conditions of the proposed appeal. Within thirty days, the Federal Court of Appeal will have to fix the hearing during which thethe prosecutor will be able to ask for new sanctions against Juve and eight other clubs, whose names appear in the investigation papers of the financial police. That is, Sampdoria, Pro Vercelli, Genoa, Parma, Pisa, Empoli, Novara and Pescara, as well as 52 executives. There is no Napoli (involved in the first sporting trial): the capital gains for the Osimhen deal were made with Lille, and there is nothing in the Turin investigation.

Sports jurisprudence is mostly against it, in matters of revocation, but the investigators of the FIGC have the impression of having new evidence in hand. The adjunct Marco Gianoglio and the prosecutors Mario Bendoni and Ciro Santoriello condensed in the assessments of the Turin prosecutors: on the capital gains, documents were allegedly found that offer evidence of even a confessional nature. From FP black book, in which sporting director Federico Cherubini stigmatizes the excessive use of artificial capital gains by the then head of the technical area Fabio Paratici. Ditto an interception of the financial director, Stefano Bertola: The financial statements of many football clubs have been somewhat saved by these capital gains. The FIGC prosecutor, who has opened a file on salary maneuvers, has started another one, against Juve and other clubs for further and new disciplinary conduct.

In the crosshairs, the partnerships highlighted in the Turin papers. Yesterday, after the friendly against Rijeka (1-0 with goals from Moise Kean), Massimiliano Allegri reported the club’s message: The general manager Scanavino spoke to the team and staff, reassuring the environment. But it is clear that in this context the agents interested in proposing players (such as Ivan Fresneda of Valladolid, who is liked by Continassa) are told that every movement is frozen until the appointment of the new board of directors on 18 January.

December 23, 2022 (change December 23, 2022 | 07:43 am)

[ad_2]

Source link