Ferrari, penalty to Sainz in Australia: the appeal is discussed on April 18th
[ad_1]
The FIA will examine on April 18 if there are grounds for reopening the Carlo Sainz case and reviewing the 5” penalty inflicted on the Ferrari driver in the Australian GP. The Spaniard, relegated 12th from 4th at the finish line in the race that ended behind the safety car, was punished for the clash with Fernando Alonso on the restart after the second red flag in the last tense stages of a very fragmented race due to interruptions and new starts . Maranello, as team principal Fred Vasseur announced in recent days, had sent the international federation a request to re-examine the facts. Next Tuesday, at 8 in the morning, the driver and the team representatives will meet in an online meeting with the stewards.
Ferrari, Vasseur: “Appeal for Sainz’s penalty in Australia. Development of the car, the direction is now right”
by Alessandra Retico
The panel will assess whether there are the necessary elements for the admissibility of the Scuderia’s request: the regulation requires that “significant, new and relevant” evidence be provided in order to reopen the case. If the elements provided are judged sufficient for re-examination, the procedure establishes a subsequent meeting between the parties and a final ruling by the FIA which will be able to confirm, reduce or cancel the penalty. Sainz is 5th in the standings at 20 points after three races: he could recover 12 if 4th place were returned to him.
Leclerc to the fans: “You know where I live, but respect my privacy. If you play, I won’t go downstairs to sign your autograph”
Ferrari obviously expects not only that the file will be reopened, but that the sentence will review the penalty and that it could arrive before the next GP in Baku on 30 April. Also for the general mood: the Prancing Horse did not get off to a good start in this World Championship even if in Australia Ferrari seemed to have improved a bit compared to Bahrain and Jeddah, despite returning home with no points. Vasseur hopes that “situations like these will not be repeated in the future, i.e. identical episodes in the same Curve-1 but with different treatment and judgment”. The Cavallino manager refers to the accidents involving Pierre Gasly and Esteban Ocon (Alpine) as well as Logan Sargeant (Williams) and Nick De Vries (Alpha Tauri) in the same circumstance: the commissioners evaluated them differently, they did not punish them . Sainz, on the other hand, was immediately investigated and penalized without being heard after the match and he complained a lot about this.
There would have been time and above all the conditions to hear Carlos’ version, given that the Spaniard wouldn’t even have messed up the positions on the podium. “And this is the greatest frustration for Carlos, he wasn’t heard like Gasly and Ocon were, also given that the race was now over and he was off the podium, therefore without conditioning him”. In the days following Melbourne, Sainz returned to Maranello to work on the simulator. With a frustration set aside and a newfound “fighting spirit”. Even if he gets some points back, he would be an extra weapon to react and fight.
[ad_2]
Source link
