Capital gains Juve, dismissal requested: new reasons for reforming sports justice

After the penalty in the sporting venue, the judges of the Turin trial say that there was no false invoicing: “The predominantly budgetary and non-fiscal purpose emerged”. For this offence, they are asking for the position of Agnelli, Paratici and Nedved to be removed. The “salary maneuver”, the one on which the Bianconeri managed by negotiating with the FIGC, remains standing

How do you explain a sporting sanction of ten points, based on the papers produced by the prosecution within an ordinary trial, in which that offense was subsequently dismissed by the judge for the preliminary investigations? The answer is not known, maybe it will come. In the meantime, illuminating the paradoxes of this dynamic is useful in highlighting once more the acrobatics of sports justicethe increasingly urgent need for an overall reform of the legal system.